Responsible procurement

Environmental labels and claims: checking evidence

A green colour, leaf or vague formula does not describe the impact of a product. A useful claim specifies what is measured, what part of the life cycle and what evidence is used.

Quick response

Essential in a minute

Ask what the promise covers exactly: material, manufacturing, use, transport, repairability or end of life. Look for a measurable criterion, perimeter, method and an identifiable organism. Then compare the lifetime, repair, energy, quantity and actual use rather than the appearance of the packaging. When two products do a different service or do not have the same duration of use, a limited comparison to the weight of packaging can lead to a misleading conclusion. Keep the page of evidence when the claim actually influences your decision or justifies a higher price.

Neutral paper, glass and metal packagings with magnifying glass and material samples
The visible material tells only one part of the life cycle: the promise must be precise and verifiable.AI-generated illustration.

1Rewording the promise

Words such as "green", "eco-responsible" or "best for the planet" remain vague and unspecified. Ask what feature is improved, what, and how much. A clear claim must be understandable without marketing interpretation.

  • Named environmental characteristic.
  • Base the comparison indicated.
  • Perimeter of the specified product or service.

2. Search for evidence and its transmitter

Identify methodology, date, organization and access to criteria. Distinguish self-declaration, private label, third-party certification and mandatory information. A label-like symbol may only be a graphic element.

  • Identifiable issuer.
  • Accessible criteria.
  • Independent control or separate self-reporting.

3. Watching the whole life cycle

An improvement on the packaging does not necessarily compensate a product that is not durable or difficult to repair. Examine materials, manufacturing, use, maintenance, energy, service life and end of life according to the most significant impacts for the category.

  • Estimated duration of use.
  • Repair and parts examined.
  • Consumption and maintenance taken into account.

4. Compare without looking for a perfect product

Use homogeneous criteria between products and prioritize those that matter for your use. Buying less, choosing a suitable size, repairing or using longer can weigh more than a small difference in packaging.

  • Same unit and same service compared.
  • Actual use taken into account.
  • Arbitrage noted without absolute promise.

Compare

Test an allegation

QuestionDue responseLow signal
What?Specific characteristicGeneral formula
How much?Measurement or thresholdNo numbers or criteria
Compared to what?Comparable referenceImplicit comparison
Who's checking?Organization and methodLogo not explained

Before you continue

Final checklist : Assess an environmental claim

Check the points you actually checked. Checks stay in this page during the visit; they are not sent to the server. A checked point does not constitute a validation of the merchant.

Guide: Assess an environmental claim · Révision éditoriale : 14 September 2026.

Frequently Asked Questions

Useful answers

Does a kraft package prove that a product is environmentally friendly?

No. The visible colour and material are not enough; examine composition, quantity, manufacture, use, life and end of life.

Are all labels valid?

No. The scope, criteria, method of control and independence of the organization vary. Look for the label documentation.

Is a "neutral" promise sufficient?

No. It must explain the scope, method, reductions actually achieved and the possible place of compensation.

To check

Reference sources and documentation

The editorial update date does not guarantee a new verification of each source. See the references for an individual situation or regulatory evolution.